i watched in awe as the young father carried the pram into the bus, calmly swiped the ticket, and proceeded to park it in the open central area. it was pink and pretty, everything that would be automatically related to babies and cuteness and awww-ness. i peeked into the pram when the father was not watching, and held my breath as the baby looked at me with gorgeous blue eyes and cheeks that matched the colour of her pram. a face of absolute calm with a pink pacifier in her mouth, as she probably contemplated very peacefully where her mom was..
i like to watch babies with their parents, their body language, their moods, just how they go about their daily lives. when you are expecting to have a child, you start thinking about its pram among other things. its probably the most convenient thing ever, you can go everywhere with your child and everyone is comfortable, developing countries even accommodate prams in their public transport system, their parks, their security-check-instruction-videos at airports, prams are everywhere. and i never stop wondering at how sophisticated they can get. prams for twins. prams for two children of different ages, bunk style, one above the other. prams which can be turned around depending on whether you want your child to look at you as you walk her, or you want it to face the world. and then the minor features, rain-proof, additional pockets for food and other baby stuff, brakes, and what not. oh and as the child grows, you change prams too, its like getting bigger trousers, bigger shoes. something like that. they help you not get tired when you are going around within the city or outside it. you can even travel with prams. you can have special baby seats installed in your car, where your baby can safely sit while you drive. just like you can take your pets in special boxes in flights.
pacifiers are not so complicated. although there are some interesting design adaptations available, like this one below - google images named it funny baby pacifier, but i am not so sure about the funny part..

but pacifiers are definitely more ubiquitous, and that explains the fact why i don't hear babies crying so often. they are always calmly contemplating about their moms' whereabouts as they look out of their cute prams.
then i wonder. when i cry, do i want to have a pacifier put into my mouth or do i want to just let it all out? agreed that babies cry much more, louder and more often than i do, but then thats probably because thats they only way they know how to express. they cant blog, for example. i think about my nephews and younger cousins whom i remember as babies, if they cried, they wanted to be fed, to be patted to sleep, but mostly to be comforted. pacifier however is not a comforter. its probably more of a shut-up-er. and as babies grow up and start learning to talk blabbering about completely random stuff, talking almost as fast, or maybe even faster than they think. mom this, dad that, and what not. it does drive you crazy, after all its a 24x7 phenomenon. but you cant have it all rosy, can you? or of course you can use the shut-up-er. i am glad my mom hasn't used it, if i told her about it, she probably would want to use it even now. even on skype.
and then i think about if this really influences a person. its not just a girly i-just-want-you-to-hold-me logic, hugs have been sheldon-cooper-scientifically proved as the most comforting concept in the whole universe, its true. sometimes those bagpack like baby carriers seem like a decent mid-way solution, because your arms and hips and back are spared of the weight as you ramble around in a mall on a lazy sunday. but back to prams and pacifiers, those who as babies don't get their share of hugs and don't get to scream their lungs out or threaten their parents with a pretense at crying because they know they will surely be heard. and if they grow up like that? without feeling the need for hugs or for letting out their emotions. hugs-are-lame theory. preferring to keep to themselves rather than reaching out when they are suffering.. sounds realistic?